California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Contact

Dohyung Kim, Chair
909.869.4645; Dept phone: 909.869.2688
dohyungkim@cpp.edu
https://www.cpp.edu/env/urp/
Undergraduate Public Information; Graduate Public Information

Accreditation Actions

Accreditation through December 31, 2027
Last Accreditation Cycle: 2021 – 2022
Next Accreditation Cycle: 2026 – 2027
Progress Report: Not Applicable

Summary of Recent Actions

November 2022: Programs granted 5 year accreditation based on PAB’s findings of compliance or substantial compliance with all domains of the Accreditation Standards. No serious deficiencies.

PAB accreditation indicates that the Program has undergone an external review and substantially meets the PAB standards and criteria. Programs granted accreditation demonstrated conformity with PAB Standards after a thorough review from the Board. PAB bases its decisions on the overall quality of the program, its performance relative to its mission and strategic plan, and its performance relative to PAB’s five standards, which encompass a total of 29 criteria and 18 curriculum sub-criteria. When PAB determines that a Program does not fully meet a criterion or curriculum sub-criterion, the Program is encouraged to take steps to improve in that area and provide information to PAB on its efforts, either during the next accreditation review or in an interim progress report.
The Planning Accreditation Board has required the Program to address issues in the following areas:

• Criterion 1A / Prior Strategic Plan and Accreditation Review determined to be partially-met. Clarify the specific undergraduate and graduate program elements in the Strategic Plan and track measures.
• Criterion 1B / Current Strategic Plan determined to be partially-met. Engage a broader mix of stakeholders in the next Strategic Plan. Clarify the specific undergraduate and graduate program elements in the Strategic Plan
• Criterion 1C / Programmatic Assessment determined to be partially-met. Distinguish between undergraduate and graduate programmatic assessment.
• Criterion 1D / Student Learning Outcomes Assessment determined to be partially-met. The Program needs direct measures for student learning assessment, and distinguish between the undergraduate and graduate program.
• Criterion 3C / Faculty Size determined to be partially-met. The Program should continue to make progress toward appropriate faculty size.

This information is a summary only. Please consult the school directly for in-depth information regarding programs, course offerings, and compliance with PAB standards. Programs should also be consulted directly for additional information on issues and areas of improvement identified during an accreditation review, and the actions that the school is taking to address these areas. If the Program has provided a response to any of the issues cited above, please see below for a link to the response.

October 2015: Programs granted 7-year accreditation based on PAB’s findings of compliance or substantial compliance with all domains of the Accreditation Standards. No serious deficiencies.

PAB accreditation indicates that the Program has undergone an external review and substantially meets the PAB standards and criteria. Programs granted accreditation demonstrated conformity with PAB Standards after a thorough review from the Board. PAB bases its decisions on the overall quality of the program, its performance relative to its mission and strategic plan, and its performance relative to PAB’s 7 standards, which encompass a total of 35 criteria and 17 curriculum sub-criteria. When PAB determines that a Program does not fully meet a criterion or curriculum sub-criterion, the Program is encouraged to take steps to improve in that area and provide information to PAB on its efforts, either during the next accreditation review or in an interim progress report.

This information is a summary only. Please consult the school directly for in-depth information regarding programs, course offerings, and compliance with PAB standards. Programs should also be consulted directly for additional information on issues and areas of improvement identified during an accreditation review, and the actions that the school is taking to address these areas.